Authors
- Obletsova Tatiana Aleksandrovna Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences Russian Federation Velikiye Luki
- Eremina Lilia Alekseevna Russian Federation Velikiye Luki
- Pukhov Aleksandr Mikhailovich Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor Russian Federation Velikiye Luki
Annotation
The relevance of the study is determined by the specifics of student sports, which combine academic and athletic activities. This leads to a deficit in training load volume and requires a special approach to monitoring athletes’ functional state to adjust their preparation. The aim of the study was to identify the features of functional readiness among players of different positions (point guards, forwards, centers) in a women’s student basketball team during the competitive period. Research methods included comprehensive testing of 10 basketball players. The functions of the central nervous system (test “Reaction to a Moving Object,” stabilographic test with stepwise impact) and the muscular system (5-second Wingate test) were assessed. The results of the study revealed specific profiles for each individual playing position. Point guards showed the shortest reaction latency and the best ability to recover the anaerobic system. Forwards demonstrated the highest reaction accuracy, the highest relative peak power, but also the greatest fatigue of the anaerobic system. The center players were characterized by the smallest relative power drop (fatigue
resistance), but the worst recovery indicators and slower motor reaction. The obtained data have scientific and practical significance, providing objective criteria for individualizing the training process and tactical planning, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of the functional qualities of players in different positions. The results can serve as model characteristics for sports orientation.
How to link insert
Obletsova, T. A., Eremina, L. A. & Pukhov, A. M. (2026). FEATURES OF FUNCTIONAL FITNESS OF ATHLETES OF VARIOUS PLAYING ROLES OF THE WOMEN’S STUDENT TEAM Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (62), 159. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2026-262-159-170
References
1.
1. Aranson M. V., Konik I. V., Kvashuk P. V. Trajectory of transition: from student sports to professional career and higher achievements (analysis of international experience). Physical education and sports training. 2025;(53):238–245. EDN: HNESSU. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Brykina V. A., Rybalkin S. N. Comparative analysis of competitive activity of Russian
basketball teams. Izvestiya Vologda State Pedagogical University. 2008;(9):131–135. EDN: KAMMCX. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Kramarenko A. L., Valtyshev K. Y., Lopatin K. O., Tagirova E.L. Optimization of functional training of the DVGAFK women’s national basketball team. Proceedings of Tula State University. Physical Culture. Sport. 2025;(7):91–98. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2305-8404-2025-7-91-98. EDN: RFLGLD.
4.
4. Lin V., Fesenko M. S. Methods of strength training of basketball students, taking into account the specifics of competitive activity. Scientific notes of the P. F. Lesgaft University.
2025;(248):45–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5930/1994-4683-2025-10-45-50. EDN: PCRLTW.
5.
5. Makeeva V. S., Chernov S. V., Laptev S. O. Formation of effective interaction of basketball players during the transition to the student team. Science and sport: current trends. 2020;26(1):25–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36028/2308-8826-2020-8-1-25-29. EDN: CPDGRH.
6.
6. Olkhovsky R. M., Ermakova M. A., Bolotova M. I. Analysis of the results of monitoring the level of student sports development in educational institutions of higher education
in the Russian Federation. Pedagogical, psychological, and biomedical problems of physical culture and sports. 2025;20(3):230–236. EDN: QCTWTN. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Rodin A. V., Ryzhkin N. V., Nemtseva E. V., Polin R. V. Management strategy for the preparation of student teams in game sports in the context of mass and professional sports.
Theory and practice of physical culture. 2025;(1):56–58. EDN: GBHWYR. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Shestakov A.V., Zemba E. A. Actual problems and prospects of student sports development. Problems of modern science and innovation. 2025;(3):106–112. EDN: IANJKB. (In Russ.)
9.
9. Streich L. A. Management of student sports in universities: structure, challenges and development prospects. Theory and practice of social development. 2025;(206):197–203. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2025.6.23. EDN: ELSTQR. (In Russ.).