Home → Releases → 2022, №2 (46) →

Study of the Natural and Ecological Framework of the City

Earth Sciences and Natural Sciences , UDC: 911.9 (470-25) DOI: 10.25688/2076-9091.2022.46.2.04

Authors

  • Goretskaya Alexandra Grigoryevna Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • Toporina Valentina Alekseevna

Annotation

In the paper, the authors consider the natural and ecological framework (NEF) on the example of Moscow addressing to the principles of its structure, its proximity to the river systems, the landscape features of the framework, the mode of use, environmental status, the set of functions performed. Based on the analysis, the main components of the NEF were identified, for which the coefficients of landscape diversity were calculated. The paper presents maps reflecting the spatial distribution of the indicator of landscape diversity, the constituent elements of the NEF. The conducted research also provides an opportunity to get an idea of the main functions of NEF in accordance with the mode of use.
Tags:
functions of green spaces , green spaces , natural and ecological framework , protected natural areas , urban landscapes , urban planning

How to link insert

Goretskaya, A. G. & Toporina, V. A. (2022). Study of the Natural and Ecological Framework of the City Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (46), 34. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9091.2022.46.2.04
References
1. 1. Master plan of the city of Moscow until 2025. URL: https://genplanmos.ru/project/generalnyy_plan_goroda_moskvy_do_2025_goda/
2. 2. Grigoriev V. A., Ogorodnikov I. A. Ecology of cities in the world, Russia, Siberia [Analyte. review] / GPNTB SB RAS. Novosibirsk, 2001. 177 p.
3. 3. Report on the state of the environment in the city of Moscow in 2019 / edited by A. O. Kulbachevsky. Moscow: DPiOOS; NIiPI IGSP, 2020. 222 p.
4. 4. Green spaces [Electronic resource] // Mosekomonitoring. URL: https://mosecom. mos.ru/zelenye-nasazhdeniya/ (date of appeal: 11.02.2022).
5. 5. Kazakov L. K. Landscape studies with the basics of landscape planning. Textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Academy, 2008. 336 p.
6. 6. Urban planning map [Electronic resource] // UAIS OGD portal. URL: https://isogd. mos.ru/isogd-portal/gis/none/none (date of appeal: 21.03.2021).
7. 7. Kochurov B. I., Ivashkina I. V. Urboecodiagnosis and balanced development. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2017. 214 p.
8. 8. Krasnoshchekova N. S. Formation of a natural framework in the master plans of cities. Moscow: Architecture-S, 2010. 183 p.
9. 9. Kuleshova M. E., Mazurov Yu. L. Environmental functions as the basis for identifying the value of territories // Unique territories in the natural and cultural heritage of the regions. Moscow: Russian Research Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1994. P. 20–31.
10. 10. Kurbatova A. S. Landscape and ecological foundations of the formation of urban planning structures / Responsible editor by V. N. Bashkin. Moscow – Smolensk: Magenta, 2004. 400 p.
11. 11. Nizovtsev V. A., Kochurov B. I., Erman N. M., Mironenko I. V., Logunova Yu. V., Kostovskaya S. K., Ivashkina I. V., Alekseeva V. O. Landscape and environmental studies of Moscow to justify the territorial planning of the city. Moscow: Prometheus, 2020. 342 p.
12. 12. Working Group on Ecological Networks of Northern Eurasia (RGESS). Information materials on environmental networks. Vol. 4. Moscow: TsODP, 2000. 32 s.
13. 13. Tikunov V. S. Modeling in cartography. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1997. 405 p.
14. 14. Ecological Atlas of Moscow. Moscow: GUP NIIPI General Plan of Moscow, 2002. 94 p.
15. 15. Electronic Legal and Regulatory Technical Information Fund. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/
16. 16. Yudina Yu. V. Morphological and morphometric analysis of the landscape structure of the Belgorod region // Scientific statements of BelSU. Ser.: Natural sciences. 2019. T. 43. No. 3. S. 307–318.
17. 17. Yakubov H. G. Environmental monitoring of green spaces in Moscow. Moscow: Stagirit-N. 262 p.
18. 18. Raymond C., Frantzeskaki N., Kabisch N., Berry P., Breil M., Niță M., Geneletti D., Calfapietra C. A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas // Environmental Science & Policy. 2017. Vol. 77. Pp. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
19. 19. Ignatieva M. Biodiversity-friendly designs in cities and towns: Towards a global biodiversinesque style // Urban Biodiversity: From Research to Practice. Oxon: Routledge (Routledge Studies in Urban Ecology), 2018. P. 216–235.
20. 20. OpenStreetMap [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.openstreetmap. org/#map=12/55.6664/37.5265&layers=H/ (дата обращения: 11.02.2022).
21. 21. Pötz H., Bleuze P. Urban green-blue grids for sustainable and dynamic cities. Delft: Coop for Life, 2012. 121 p.
22. 22. Shuang Wang, MaoquanWu, Mengmeng Hua, Chen Fan, Tao Wang, Beicheng Xia. Promoting landscape connectivity of highly urbanized area: An ecological network approach // Ecological Indicators. Vol. 125. June 2021, 107487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107487
23. 23. Xiu N., Ignatieva M., Konijnendijk С. van den B., Zhang S. Applying a socioecological green network framework to Xi’an City, China // Landscape and Ecological Engineering. 2020. № 16 (2). P. 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-020-00412-z
Download file .pdf 1.12 Mb