Home → Releases → № 4 (56) →

AGE PECULIARITIES OF MODERN 100-KILOMETER FEMALE RUNNERS

Natural Science Foundations of Physical Education and Sports Training , UDC: 796.422.16 DOI: 10.24412/2076-9091-2024-456-88-97

Authors

  • Nemtsev Oleg Borisovich Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor
  • Nemtseva Natalya Alekseevna Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
  • Kucherenko Yulia Olegovna
  • Polyansky Alexander Vitalievich Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor

Annotation

The aim of the study was to investigate the age characteristics of 100-kilometer female runners and their time dynamics. The study analyzed data on the age and athletic performance of the World’s top 100 female runners in 2005 and 2023 in the 5000-meter, 10 000-meter, half-marathon, marathon, and 100-kilometre races. To identify the specificity of age data among female runners at different distances, in different years and in the groups of elite (best 10 results), sub-elite (from 11th to 30th results) and pre-elite (results from 31st to 100th) was used Univariate General Linear Model and Tukey’s post hoc test. It was found that the age of female runners at 100 km was significantly more than at all other distances studied in both 2005 and 2023 in the elite, sub-elite and pre-elite groups. No significant differences in the age of 100 km female runners in different years were found in the selected groups. The differences in the age of female athletes in the elite, sub-elite and pre-elite groups at a distance of 100 km in both 2005 and 2023 are also nonsignificant.
Tags:
elite , pre-elite , sub-elite , ultramarathon , Women

How to link insert

Nemtsev, O. B., Nemtseva, N. A., Kucherenko, Y. O. & Polyansky, A. V. (2024). AGE PECULIARITIES OF MODERN 100-KILOMETER FEMALE RUNNERS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (56), 88. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2024-456-88-97
References
1. 1. Agawa H., Yamada N., Enomoto Y., Suzuki H., Hosono A., Arakawa K., Shibata K., Hoshimo H., Kobayashi M., Enomoto Y., Ghadimi R., Tokudome M., Imaeda N., Tokudome S., Suzuki H., Miyata M., Goto C., Marumoto M. Changes of mental stress biomarkers in ultramarathon // International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008. Vol. 29. P. 867–871. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-ssss490
2. 2. Baska R. S., Moses F. M., Graeber G., Kearney G. Gastrointestinal bleeding during an ultramarathon // Digestive Diseases and Sciences.1990. Vol. 35. P. 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01536777
3. 3. Bird S. R., Linden M., Hawley J. A. Acute changes to biomarkers as a consequence of prolonged strenuous running // Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 2014. Vol. 51. P. 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563213492147
4. 4. Bracher A., Knechtle B., Gnadinger M., Burge J., Rust C. A., Knechtle P., Rosemann T. Fluid intake and changes in limb volumes in male ultra-marathoners: does fluid overload lead to peripheral oedema? // European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2012. Vol. 112. P. 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2056-3
5. 5. Cejka N., Knechtle B., Rust C. A., Rosemann T., Lepers R. Performance and age of the fastest female and male 100-KM ultramarathoners worldwide from 1960 to 2012 // The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015. Vol. 29. P. 1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000370
6. 6. Costa R. J. S., Knechtle B., Tarnopolsky M., Hoffman M. D. Nutrition for ultramarathonrunning: Trail, track, and road // International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2019. Vol. 29 (2). P. 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0255
7. 7. da Fonseca-Engelhardt K., Knechtle B., Rüst C. A., Knechtle P., Lepers R., Rosemann T. Participation and performance trends in ultra-endurance running races under extreme conditions — ‘Spartathlon’ versus ‘Badwater’ // Extreme Physiology & Medicine. 2013. Vol. 2. Р. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-7648-2-15
8. 8. Hoffman M. D., Krouse R. Ultra-obligatory running among ultramarathon runners // Research in Sports Medicine. 2018. Vol. 26 (2). P. 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2018.1431533
9. 9. Hoffman M. D., Wegelin J. A. The western states 100-mile endurance run: participation and performance trends // Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2009. Vol. 41. P. 2191–2198. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a8d553
10. 10. Scheer V., Di Gangi S., Villiger E., Nikolaidis P. T., Rosemann T., Knechtle B. Age-related participation and performance trends of children and adolescents in ultramarathon running // Research in Sports Medicine. 2020. Vol. 28 (4). P. 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2020.1781124
11. 11. Schulz R., Curnow C. Peak performance and age among superathletes: track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis and golf // Journal of Gerontology. 1988. Vol. 43. P. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/43.5
Download file .pdf 546.12 kb