Authors
- Lopatnikov Dmitry Leonidovich Doctor of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor
- Babichev Roman Romanovich
- Zotov Dmitry Dmitrievich
Annotation
Today, the theme of relations in the Nature – Society system has come to the forefront of public discourse. This discourse again raises the question of rethinking the concept of geographical determinism. As people’s environmental claims grow, as scientific and technological progress develops, and as we move towards a post-industrial economy, geographical determinism is not cancelled, but revived in a new capacity. Never before in the history of mankind has the environmental agenda had such an impact on economic development. Today we can speak of geographical neo-determinism. The main manifestation of the revival of the theory of geographical determinism in the modern era in practice is the concept of ‘Sustainable Development’, which has become the official doctrine of the UN and has a significant impact on the development of the entire world economy in the XXI century.
How to link insert
Lopatnikov, D. L., Babichev, R. R. & Zotov, D. D. (2025). GEOGRAPHICAL NON-DETERMINISM AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (57), 8. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2025-157-8-18
References
1.
1. Vorontsov N. N. Evolution. Speciation. The system of the organic world: Selected works. M., 2005. (In Russ).
2.
2. Gladkiy Yu. N., Lopatnikov D. L. Geographical neodeterminism of postindustrial time. Society. Wednesday. Development. 2021;4:68–78. (In Russ).
3.
3. Dridze T. M. The ecoanthropocentric model of social cognition as a way to overcome the paradigmatic crisis in sociology. Sociological research. 2000;(2):20–28. (In Russ).
4.
4. Kabo R. M. Nature and man in their relationship as a subject of socio-cultural geography.
Questions of geography. Sat. 5. Geography of population. М.: OGIZ, 1946. Pp. 7–18. (In Russ).
5.
5. Castels M. The Information Age. Economy. Society. Culture. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ).
6.
6. Kotlyakov V. M. We are a grain of sand in terms of influence on the climate. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. URL: https://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx-?id=1d86171f-3e63-419d-801c-03ff5d388b4f&print=1 (accessed: 11.30.2024). (In Russ).
7.
7. Zakharova E. Y. Theory of ecologically oriented anthropocentrism. Scientists note to ZabGU. A series of Sociological sciences. Philosophy. Ethics. Regional studies. 2013;117–121. (In Russ).
8.
8. Lopatnikov D. L. Geoecology of post-industrial time. Regional studies. 2016;3(53):118–124. (In Russ).
9.
9. Lopatnikov D. L. Migration of the center of ecological distress and “geo-ecological transition”. Izvestiya RAS. The series is geographical. 2020;84(5):728–736. (In Russ).
10.
10. Lopatnikov D. L. Paradigms of “Sustainable development” and “Green economy” in the context of new geodeterminism. Rational nature management: traditions and innovations: Proceedings of the III International Conference (Moscow, Moscow State University, October 20–22, 2022). Ed. by M. V. Slipenchuk. M.: Nauka, 2022;42–48. (In Russ).
11.
11. Meadows D. et al. Limits of growth. Translated from English. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1991. 208 p. (In Russ).
12.
12. Montesquieu Sh.-L. de. Selected works. Chapter XIV. M.: Goslitizdat, 1955. (In Russ).
13.
13. Reimers N. F. Hopes for the survival of mankind. M.: Young Russia, 1992. 368 p. (In Russ).
14.
14. Simon J. An inexhaustible resource. M.: Socium, 2005. 797 p. (In Russ).
15.
15. Sakaya T. The value created by knowledge, or the history of the future. The new post-industrial wave in the West. Ed. by V. L. Inozemtsev. 1999. (In Russ).
16.
16. Semenov S. M. How does a person influence the global climate of the Earth? The Century of Geography. M.: Bustard, 2018;49–71. (In Russ).
17.
17. Snakin V. V. Global climate changes: forecasts and reality. Life of the Earth. 2019;41(2):148–164. (In Russ).
18.
18. Shpolyanskaya N. A. Climate and its dynamics in the Pleistocene-Holocene as a basis for the emergence of various risks in the development of cryolithozone areas. Georisk. International Scientific Journal. 2019;13(1):6–24. (In Russ).
19.
19. Shuper V. A. Innovative development in the light of L. N. Gumilev’s Eurasian theory. Political Conceptology. 2012;(4):123–130. (In Russ).
20.
20. Atkisson A. Believing Cassandra: How to be an Optimist in a Pessimist’s World. Routledge, 2010.