Authors
- Shulgina Olga Vladimirovna Doctor of Historical Sciences, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor
- Samusenko Dmitry Nikolaevich PhD (Geography), a senior lecturer of department of Geography, Institute of Mathematics, Computer Science and Natural Sciences, MCU; researcher of the laboratory of Geography of World Development, Institute of Geography, RAS. E-mail: konfederator@mail.ru
Annotation
Socio-economic and recreational (public) geography is an actively developing branch of geographical science, creating new, practice-oriented directions at the junction
with other sciences, including those related to the need to improve geographical education. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the theoretical foundations of educational geo-urban studies as an actual field of socio-economic and recreational geography. The research is based on an analysis of publications by famous geographers from different years.; many years of experience in scientific, pedagogical and expert activities of the authors; current trends in scientific and practical geographical activities. The main research methods are historical, which allowed us to study the logical sequence of the emergence and development of geo–urban studies in general; analytical, which allowed us to substantiate a new direction — educational geo-urban studies; system-structural, which allowed us to identify the place of educational geo-urban studies in the system of geographical sciences. The key periods of the development of geo-urban studies in Russia are associated with the activities of outstanding scientists from the 19th century to the present day: K. I. Arsenyev, V. P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky, N. N. Baransky, R. M. Kabo, G. M. Lappo, E. N. Percika
et al. Educational geo-urban studies as a new direction of geo-urban studies, which is part of socio-economic geography, covers the problems of the territorial rganization
of the education system in cities, the impact of education on the urban environment, the use of elements of the urban environment for the development and improvement of education. This field occupies a special place in the system of geographical sciences and is closely related to recreational geography. The main research approaches and methods in educational geo-urban studies are territorial (spatial), complex, problematic, constructive and predictive approaches; methods are comparative geographical, zoning, cartographic, expeditionary, modeling, geoinformation. Thus, educational geo-urban studies is a synthesis of geographical science and educational technologies. It contributes to the formation of an understanding of complex interrelationships in the urban environment, as well as develops the skills necessary to solve urgent urban problems, and helps strengthen the local history component in education.
How to link insert
Shulgina, O. V. & Samusenko, D. N. (2025). EDUCATIONAL GEOURBANISTICS AS A RELEVANT FOCUS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND RECREATIONAL GEOGRAPHY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (60), 53. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2025-460-53-73
References
1.
1. Baklanov P. Ya. Territorial organization and spatial development: the relationship between concepts and processes. In: Geosystems of the eastern regions of Russia: features of their structures and spatial development. Vladivostok: Dalnauka Publishing House. 2019:10–16. EDN: IVYUTO. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Bykhovskaya I. M. Applied vector of cultural studies: the sought and the existing. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts. 2011;(14):21–40. EDN: NQSWAZ. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Bulanov M. V., Rossinskaya A. N., Asonova E. A. Educational Urbanism: An Experience of Describing Key Concepts. Scientific and Pedagogical Review. 2021;(6):236–245. https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2021-6-236-245. EDN: PIPRLY. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Gamayunov O. A. Ecological Urbanism: An Innovative Approach to Urban Planning. Bulletin of the Kerch State Marine Technological University. 2024;(4);45–51. EDN: CMANIR. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Glozman O. S. Underground Urbanization Trends. Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2017;(2):79–83. EDN: YRGKRF. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Goncharova V. A. Contents of Professional Training of English Language Teachers from the Perspective of Educational Urbanism. Alma Mater (Higher School Bulletin). 2022;(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-22.073. EDN: DZXHOI. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Ignatieva E. Yu., Gorycheva S. N., Zvyaglova M. V. Educational urbanism in the context of didactics. Perspectives of science and education. 2022;(4):42–57. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.4.3. EDN: HRHLWW. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Kalutskov V. N. On the Types of Districts in Cultural Geography. Cultural and Humanitarian Geography. 2013;2(1):3–9. EDN: PXBAYB. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Lappo G. M. Literary Geourbanistics. Economic and Social Geography on the Threshold of the 21st Century. Smolensk: Smolensk Humanitarian University; 1997:97–109. EDN: VNYEGO. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Leontyeva E. Yu. Sensory Urbanism: Introduction to the Subject Field. Sociology of the City. 2023;(3):71–84. https://doi.org/10.35211/19943520_2023_3_71. EDN: CSDMBM. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Merinova Yu. Yu., Kuzmenko D. R. History of the Development of Domestic Geourbanistics in the 19th – 20th Centuries. Advances in Modern Natural Science. 2023;(9):48–53. https://doi.org/10.17513/use.38102. EDN: TXGUEB. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Nalobina A. N. Environmental well-being in the context of Moscow’s sustainable development: review of scientific publications in the journal of “MCU Journal of Natural Sciences”. MCU Journal of Natural Sciences. 2024;(4):10–17. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2024-456-10-17. EDN: WMCJEK.
13.
13. Obedkov A. P. Domestic Scientific School of Geographical Urban Studies: Leaders and Directions of Scientific Research. Historical Demography. 2020;(1):59–80. https://doi.org/10.19110/2304-5922-2020-1-59-80. EDN: MAZBTG. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Olesik N. S. Military Geourbanistics and Military Geography. Military Thought. 2006;(4):38–47. EDN: HTPTXL. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Solomin V. P., Letyagin L. N., Ignatiev D. Yu. Educational Universe of the City: Pedagogical Aspects of Philosophical Urban Studies. Nizhny Novgorod Education. 2014;(2):124–129. EDN: SIUTAT. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Tarkhov S. A. Socio-Economic Geography: Its Essence, Subject of Study, and Methods. Regional Studies. 2013;(3):9–13. EDN: RNFLIF. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Fedorova M. A., Churilova I. N., Vinnikova T. A. Training of student translators from the standpoint of educational urban studies. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2023;(1):66–74.
https://doi.org/10.20323/1813_145X_2023_1_130_66_74. EDN: OOWCWM. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Shevelev A. N. Methodological approaches to modern educational urban studies. Continuous education. 2015;(3):75–89. EDN: VXUHRB. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Sholomova T. V. Philosophical urban studies and pedagogical St. Petersburg studies in the context of university education. Ideas and ideals. 2019;11(4-):205–216. https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2019-11.4.1-205-216. EDN: MWGQJF. (In Russ.).