Home → Releases → 3 (63) →

FEATURES OF BIOGEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF AVIFAUNA OF TATARSTAN

Ecology , UDC: 574.9 DOI: 10.24412/2076-9091-2026-363-23-38

Authors

  • Rakhimov Ilgizar Ilyasovich Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor Russian Federation Kazan
  • Basyyrov Aizat Mirkasimovich Russian Federation Kazan
  • Ignashev Nikita Evgenievich Russian Federation Kazan
  • Latipova Laysan Ildarovna Russian Federation Kazan

Annotation

Study of zoogeographical features of the current state of the avifauna of the Republic of Tatarstan. The material for the analysis was ornithological studies in the Republic of Tatarstan and the city of Kazan from 1980 to the present using route censuses. An inventory of the modern taxonomic composition of the avifauna of the re- gion and an analysis of all available literary sources on the characteristics of the fauna of birds of the Republic of Tatarstan for more than two hundred years were carried out. Zoogeographical features of the avifauna with the landscape and geographical conditions of the region were revealed. An analysis of the distribution of faunogenetic types of birds in the territory of the Republic of Tatarstan was carried out. The relationship between the faunogenetic types of birds and the nature of their stay in the territory is presented using the example of the city of Kazan.
Tags:
ecological complexes of birds , faunogenetic type , Republic of Tatarstan , type of origin of fauna , Авифауна

How to link insert

Rakhimov, I. I., Basyyrov, A. M., Ignashev, N. E. & Latipova, L. I. (2026). FEATURES OF BIOGEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF AVIFAUNA OF TATARSTAN Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 3 (63), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2026-363-23-38
References
1. 1. Ananin A. A. Birds of the Northern Baikal region: dynamics and features of popu- lation formation. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University Publishing House; 2010. 296 p. EDN: QKTVLR. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Archimaeva T. P., Kartashov N. D., Zabelin V. I. Review of the avifauna of the Central Sayan (Republic of Tyva). Fauna of the Urals and Siberia. 2017;(1):173–194. EDN: YPBVXP. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Askeyev A. O., Askeyev O. V., Askeyev I. V. Spatial distribution and long-term popula- tion dynamics of the Eurasian jay and the three-toed woodpecker in the forests of the Republic of Tatarstan. Russian Journal of Applied Ecology. 2017;(9):9–13. EDN: YOCYTL. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Baranov A. A. Birds of the Altai-Sayan ecoregion: spatiotemporal dynamics of biodi- versity. Krasnoyarsk: KSPU; 2012. 464 p. EDN: QKUWAV. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Basyrov A. M., Rakhimov I. I. Current state of avifauna of the Republic of Ta- tarstan. Materials of the International Conference “Kozubayev Readings, 2024. Kazakh- stan and Modern Challenges”. Petropavlovsk: M. Kozybayev NKU. 2024;2:426–430. EDN: VQCHCR. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Berezovikov N. N. Current state of avifauna of Eastern Kazakhstan. Russian Orni- thological Journal. 2021;30(2096):3570–3573. EDN: DZIKUJ. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Velik V. P. Faunogenetic structure of the Palearctic avifauna. Zoological Journal. 2006;85(3):298–316. EDN: HTESVP. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Ivliev V. G. Birds of Tatarstan: abundance, distribution: Order Passeriformes. Novo- sibirsk: SB RAS; 2020. 314 p. EDN: BENTFV. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Ermolaev O. P., Igonin M. E., Bubnov M. Yu., Pavlova S. V. Landscapes of the Re- public of Tatarstan. Regional landscape-ecological analysis. Kazan: Slovo. 2007. 411 p. EDN: WXNMZJ. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Livanov S. G., Bochkareva E. N., Vartapetov L. G. Rare birds of the Central Altai: diversity, reserve and expediency of their inclusion in the republican Red Book. Endangered, rare and poorly studied animal species and their reflection in the Red Book of the Altai Republic of past and future editions (criticism and proposals). 2015:163–168. EDN: UPQWBZ. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Vegetation of the European part of the USSR. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 1980. 429 p. EDN: VLBMBX. (In Russ.).
12. 12. Rakhimov I.I. Avifauna of the Middle Volga region under conditions of anthropo- genic transformation of natural landscapes: dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Biolo- gical Sciences. Moscow; 2002. 396 p. EDN: QDQDAB. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Basyyrov A., Leonova T., Rakhimov I. Retrospective taxonomic analysis of avi- fauna of the Republic of Tatarstan. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023;407:01002. https://doi. org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340701002. EDN: SRGIDP.
14. 14. Vázquez-López M., Ramírez-Barrera S. M., Terrones-Ramírez A. K. et al. Bio- geographic factors contributing to the diversification of Euphoniinae (Aves, Passeriformes, Fringillidae): a phylogenetic and ancestral areas analysis. ZooKeys. 2024;1188:169–195. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1188.107047. EDN: WNMOXG.
15. 15. Chace J. F., Walsh J. J. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2006;74:46–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
16. 16. González-Oreja J. A., Hoagstrom C. W., Brooks J. E., Davenport S. R. Birds of different biogeographic origins respond in contrasting ways to urbanization. Biological Conservation. 2011;144(1):234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.021
17. 17. Jokimäki J., Suhonen J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M. L., Carbó-Ramírez P. Urban core areas are important for species conservation: A European-level analysis of breeding bird species. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2018;178:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2018.05.020
Download file .pdf 957.05 kb