Authors
- Dmitrieva Valentina Timofeevna Ph.D. (Geography)
Annotation
The transboundary territories of the south of Siberia and the Far East are supplemented with basin content. Pools are perceived as self-organizing dynamic geosystems.
The article тhe content of transboundary territories as special geosystems with ecotonic (transitional) properties has been clarified. The theoretical content of transboundary territories as integral geosystems is substantiated. Basin and administrative criteria for the allocation of transboundary territories are identified. The analysis of economic activity in cross-border geosystems is carried out. It is revealed that even a comprehensive study of the border territories on one side of the border cannot give a sufficient idea of the state of the entire cross-border territory. This circumstance determined the search for a unified scientific approach to analysis, the establishment of a single content of a cross-border object. The analysis of land use and the state of ecology in the border parts of adjacent states is carried out. The analysis of floods in transboundary geosystems and their dependence on economic activity within both basin slopes of the Upper Amur is carried out. The conclusion about multiple information concentrations in cross-border territories and their determining importance in solving a number of state and natural problems is ubstantiated.
How to link insert
Dmitrieva, V. T. (2022). Transboundary Geosystems of Siberia and China: Methodological Aspect Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (46), 25. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9091.2022.46.2.03
References
1.
1. Antipov A. N., Fedorov V. N. Landscape-ridroloric organization of the territory. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of SB RAS, 2000. 254 p.
2.
2. Baklanov P. Ya., Ganzei S. S. Cross-border territories: problems of sustainable nature management. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2008. 216 p.
3.
3. Gansei S. S. Cross-border geosystems of the south of the Russian Far East and Northeast China. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2004. 231 p.
4.
4. Zuenko I. Yu. Chinese presence in agriculture of the Far East: some aspects of the problem // Izvestia of the Eastern Institute. 2015. № 2 (26). P. 51–59.
5.
5. Dmitrieva V. T., Lugovskaya A. M. Transboundary environmental problems of Russia and China // Problems of regional ecology. 2021. № 2. P. 84–86.
6.
6. Kolomyts E. G. Landscape studies in transition zones (methodological aspect). Moscow: Science, 1987. 117 p.
7.
7. Koronkevich N. I. Hydrological cross-border transfer in the CIS countries // Cross-border problems of the CIS countries. Moscow: Opus, 2003. P. 22–31.
8.
8. Trough L. M. Basin concept in environmental management. Irkutsk: IG SB RAS, 2001. 163 p.
9.
9. Kochurov B. I., Ivanov Yu. G. Study and accounting of ecotons in land use // Geography and natural resources. 1992. № 1. P. 131–1326.
10.
10. Makhinov A. N., Kim V. I., Voronov B. A. Floods in the Amur basin in 2013: causes and consequences // Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014. № 2. P. 5–14.
11.
11. Makhinov A. N. The main factors of the formation of catastrophic floods in the Amur River basin in 2013 // Readings in memory of Vladimir Yakovlevich Levanidov. Vladivostok. Dalnauca, 2014. № 6. P. 435–442.
12.
12. Milkov F. N. River basin as a paradinamic landscape system and environmental management issues // Geography and natural resources. 1981. № 4. P. 11–18.
13.
13. Naprasnikov A. T. Flood landscapes: concept and methods of calculation // Successes of modern natural science. 2020. № 5. P. 70–75.
14.
14. Naprasnikov A. T. Geo-information and digital reclamation. Irkutsk: Publishing House of ISU, 2018. 288 p.
15.
15. Roslikova V. I. Use of soil resources of the border areas of the Middle Amur region // Problems of sustainable use of transboundary territories (materials of the international conference). Vladivostok, 2006. P. 124–126.