Authors
- Lapshina Marina Veniaminovna Candidate of Biological Sciences
Annotation
This work is devoted to identifying the features of stress tolerance and adaptive capabilities of students of different temperament types. 68 students at the Moscow City
Pedagogical University participated in the study: 36 of them were fourth year (graduate) students and 32 were first-year students. The indicators of neuropsychiatric stability according to the Prognosis method and the degree of stress tolerance according to the K method were studied in the subjects. Schreiner, the adaptive capabilities of the body according to the parameter of the individual minute, the prevailing type of temperament was determined according to G. Eysenck’s questionnaire. Based on a detailed analysis of the degree of manifestation of neuropsychiatric stability and the level of emotional state control in students of different courses, we identified four groups of subjects with varying degrees of stress tolerance: high, good, satisfactory and unsatisfactory. According to the results of the study, among the first-year students, people with good stress tolerance predominate, among whom the most common type of temperament was the sanguine type. Among
the students with satisfactory and unsatisfactory neuropsychiatric stability, those with a melancholic temperament predominated. The fourth-year students showed predominant satisfactory stress tolerance. Among them, the choleric type of temperament became the most common. Students with sanguine temperament dominated the group of people with good stress tolerance. The group of students with unsatisfactory stress tolerance was represented by representatives with a melancholic type of temperament. An assessment of adaptive abilities based on the individual minute parameter showed that in most cases, the adequacy of real-time reflection is typical for people with high stress tolerance and belonging to sanguine and phlegmatic temperament types. Students with unsatisfactory neuropsychiatric stability (choleric and melancholic) speed up time. This indicates a decrease in the adaptive abilities of the body due to the peculiarities of the functional state of the nervous system,
thereby determining low stress tolerance. The data obtained can be used to develop trainings and programs to improve students’ adaptive capabilities and stress tolerance, based on knowledge of their temperament.
How to link insert
Lapshina, M. V. (2026). FEATURES OF STRESS TOLERANCE AND ADAPTIVE CAPABILITIES OF STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT TEMPERAMENT TYPES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (61), 121. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2026-121-133
References
1.
1. Zvereva M. V., Bobkov G. S., Fedorova E. Yu., Bobkova S. N. Assessment of cardiac activity of adolescents against the background of educational stress. Bulletin of Volgograd State Medical University. 2021;79(3):116–118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.19163/1994-9480-2021-3(79)-116-118. EDN: XJOKCV.
2.
2. Kropova Yu. G., Korobanova N. K. Features of higher nervous activity of biology students of Moscow State Pedagogical Univ. Bulletin of Moscow State Pedagogical Univ. Series: Natural Sciences. 2021;42(2):18–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9091.2021.42.2.2. EDN: ANMEPB.
3.
3. Nasledov A. D. Mathematical methods of psychological research: Data analysis and interpretation: Textbook. St. Petersburg: Rech. 2004. ISBN: 5-9268-0275-7. EDN: QXJHNV. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Romashin V. N., Atamanova G. I. Retrospective analysis of the stress phenomenon: physiological and psychological approach. Psychology. Historical and critical reviews and modern research. 2023;12(9-1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2023.43.73.006. EDN: GNYKSD. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Semenova T. N., Novikova Yu. L. Study of the Features of Subjective Perception of Time in Students Depending on Their Psychophysiological State. Bulletin of Moscow State Pedagogical Univ. Series: Natural Sciences. 2025;59(3):76–87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2025-359-76-87. EDN: INQNFP.
6.
6. Semizdralova O. A. Development of stress resistance: A textbook for students of higher education institutions. St. Petersburg: Science-Intensive Technologies. 2023. 82 p. ISBN: 978-5-907618-37-4. EDN: HUITWP. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Stepina N. V., Vorobyova A. S. Stress resistance of 1st and 4th year students of different profiles of study at the university. Problems of modern pedagogical education. 2018;(60-3):461–464. EDN: YMBQPJ. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Fudin N. A., Klassina S. Ya., Bykova E. V. Human psychoemotional stress and subjective perception of time. Bulletin of new medical technologies. 2021;28(4):35–40.
https://doi.org/10.24412/1609-2163-2021-4-35-40. EDN: IHYYLX. (In Russ.).
9.
9. De la Fuente J., Zapata L., Martínez-Vicente J. M., Sander P., Putwain D. Personal Self-regulation, Self-regulated Learning and Coping Strategies, in University Context with Stress. Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. Intelligent Systems Reference Library. 2015;76:223–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_9.