Authors
- Piskaev Alexander Alexandrovich A doctoral student of the G.A. Aliyev Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan. E-mail: aytan_bashirova@yahoo.com Russian Federation Chelyabinsk
- Nenasheva Anna Valerievna Doctor of Biological Sciences, A doctoral student of the G.A. Aliyev Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan. E-mail: aytan_bashirova@yahoo.com Russian Federation Chelyabinsk
Annotation
Chronic occupational stress in healthcare workers leads to autonomic imbalance. Kinesiological massage demonstrates clinical efficacy in its correction, but the neurophysiological mechanisms mediating this effect remain understudied. The aim of the study was to identify the central mechanisms of autonomic balance correction during a single session of kinesiological massage.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted with 58 female medical workers showing signs of occupational stress. The acute effects of a standardized kinesiological massage session were assessed compared to a placebo procedure. Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters, electroencephalography (EEG), and salivary
cortisol levels were recorded synchronously before and after the intervention. It was found that kinesiological massage, unlike placebo, induced statistically significantly more pronounced positive changes: an increase in the power of the high-frequency component of HRV (HF) by 215.4 ± 25.6 ms², an increase in alpha-rhythm power in the occipital cortex by 22,5 ± 3.8 %, and a decrease in cortisol level by 3.8 ± 0.5 nmol/l. Multiple regression analysis revealed that increased alpha activity was the strongest predictor of increased parasympathetic tone (β = 0.58, p < 0.001). The high coherence of changes in EEG, HRV, and cortisol indicators confirms the systemic nature of the response. The obtained results indicate that the therapeutic effect of kinesiological massage
in autonomic dysfunction is mediated by central mechanisms, primarily through the modulation of thalamocortical and limbic-reticular structure activity. This provides a neurophysiological
rationale for using the method in rehabilitation and prevention programs for stress-induced conditions.
How to link insert
Piskaev, A. A. & Nenasheva, A. V. (2026). KINESIOLOGICAL MASSAGE AS A MODULATOR OF THE CENTRAL AUTONOMIC NETWORK ACTIVITY: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL SUBSTANTIATION OF EFFECTIVENESS IN STRESS-INDUCED AUTONOMIC IMBALANCE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (62), 94. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9091-2026-262-94-109
References
1.
1. Bazanova O. M., Vernon D. Interpreting EEG alpha activity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014;44:94–110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev. 2013.05.007. EDN: UENRUF.
2.
2. Piskaev A. A. Use of applied kinesiology methods to correct heart rate variability during muscle fatigue. Modern issues of biomedicine. 2025;9(32):19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2588-0500-2025_09_02_19. EDN: MQSPUR.
3.
3. Boxmeyer C. L., Stager C. G., Miller Sh. et al. Mindful Coping Power effects on children’s autonomic nervous system functioning and long-term behavioral outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(11):3621. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113621. EDN: MJLPUE.
4.
4. Laborde S., Mosley E., Thayer J. F. Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research: recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis,
and data reporting. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213
5.
5. Moraska A., Pollini R. A., Boulanger K., Brooks M. Z., Teitlebaum L. Physiological adjustments to stress measures following massage therapy: a review of the literature.
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2010;7(4):409–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nen093
6.
6. Quadt L., Critchley H., Nagai Y. Cognition, emotion, and the central autonomic network. Autonomic Neuroscience. 2022;238:102948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu. 2022.102948. EDN: DYTHHX.
7.
7. Sklerov M., Dayan E., Browner N. Functional neuroimaging of the central autonomic network: recent developments and clinical implications. Clinical Autonomic Research.
2019;29(6):555–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0577-0. EDN: FTYDQG.
8.
8. Spalding D. M., Ejoor T., Zhao X. et al. Effects of a brief resonance frequency breathing exercise on heart rate variability and inhibitory control in the context of generalised anxiety disorder. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09687-0. EDN: MJJHAB.
9.
9. Thayer J. F., Lane R. D. A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2000;61(3):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4
10.
10. Tiwari R., Kumar R., Malik S. et al. Analysis of heart rate variability and implication of different factors on heart rate variability. Current Cardiology Reviews. 2021;17(5):e160721189770. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X16999201231203854. EDN: OPRBIU.

